Having successfully edited wikipedia and then tried to edit climate articles I am strongly against the idea of a wiki like wikipedia for real (skeptic) science, because science like skepticism is about facts, whereas wikipedia was just a consensus of "97 percenters".

So, I would suggest, that you set as one of your primary rules that all the articles should be properly backed by properly skeptical references - in other words, that they are backed by facts and not opinions.

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.